Giorgione: “Judith”, c. 1504, Hermitage.

Giorgione: Judith with the Head of Holofernes. St. Petersberg, Hermitage.

Although originally given to Raphael, scholars have for over a century agreed that the Hermitage Judith with the Head of Holofernes is an early work by Giorgione. Moreover, they agree that it is a ground–breaking work.

In 1996 Jaynie Anderson wrote: “With this small picture, Giorgione introduce the Jewish heroine of the Apocrypha to Venetian painting….”* Three years later Terisio Pignatti wrote that “Giorgione’s Judith with the Head of Holofernes introduces numerous innovations that make the painting fascinating, particularly in the field of iconography…”** (52)

Characteristically, Giorgione avoided the use of stock or standard iconographical elements. In 2007 Wolfgang Eller noted that Giorgione’s painting contains “no optical indication of the events. There is no female servant, no tent, no besieged city, and no waiting figures in the background that illustrate the story.”***

All commentators seem to agree that the most striking element in the painting is the bare leg of Judith.  According to Terisio Pignati, “Giorgione inserts a completely new motif in the garments which reveal the left leg of the woman.”#  But they can find no good explanation and fall back on “eroticism” and “sensuality.” According to Wolfgang Eller,

the raised leg makes an extensive laying bare of the female thigh possible for the painter. In Giorgione’s time, this was considered highly erotic, for a woman to show only her calves was even more daring than a bare bosom. Thus from the aspect of the observer of those times, the depicted figure is identifiable as being erotic.##

It would appear, however, that in depicting the “bare thigh” Giorgione was just paying close attention to the biblical account in the Latin Vulgate, the only Bible in use at the time.

Chapter 9 of the Book of Judith gives the famous prayer of the Jewish heroine as she prepares for her encounter with the enemy tyrant. Here is verse 2 from the Jerusalem Bible.

Lord, God of my father Simeon,

You armed him with a sword to take vengeance on the foreigners

Who had undone a virgin’s girdle to her shame,

Laid bare her thigh to her confusion, violated her womb to her dishonor…

Judith is referring to the story of the rape of Dinah, the daughter of Jacob and the sister of Simeon, from the Book of Genesis, 34: 1-3.

Dinah, who was Jacob’s daughter by Leah, went out to visit the women of that region. Shechem, the son of Hamor the Hivite, who was ruler of that region, saw her, carried her off and raped her, and so dishonoured her.

This incident led to the slaughter of the Hivite men after they had been tricked into undergoing circumcision.

It would appear that Giorgione used an exposed thigh to indicate a woman in danger of sexual assault. In another early work that we only have in a 17th century copy by David Teniers, Giorgione used the same motif. He exposed the thigh of the Madonna in a depiction of the apocryphal encounter with robbers on the flight into Egypt. This copy of the lost Giorgione has for centuries been mis-identified as the “Discovery of Paris,” but in my paper on the “Tempest” I have demonstrated that it should be called the “Encounter with the Robbers on the Flight into Egypt.”

David Teniers: Mid-seventeenth century copy of a lost Giorgione usually called the “Discovery of Paris” but actually, “The Encounter with Robbers on the Flight into Egypt.”

Giorgione also paid close attention to another element in the biblical account. Chapter 10 of the Book of Judith gives a detailed account of Judith putting on her finery.

There she removed the sackcloth she was wearing and, taking off her widow’s dress, she washed all over, anointed herself with costly perfumes, dressed her hair, wrapped a turban around it and put on the dress she used to wear on joyful occasions when her husband Manasseh was alive. She put sandals on her feet, put on her necklaces, bracelets, rings, earrings, and all her jewelry, and made herself beautiful enough to catch the eye of every man who saw her.

Judith’s deed is usually seen as an heroic attempt to deliver not just herself but her people from danger. Yet during the Renaissance she was often seen as a prototype of Mary. Perhaps it was this aspect that influenced Giorgione or his patron. Judith’s prayer (9:11) sounds very similar to Mary’s famous Magnificat.

Your strength does not lie in numbers,

Nor your might in violent men;

Since you are the God of the humble,

The help of the oppressed,

The support of the weak,

The refuge of the forsaken,

The savior of the despairing.

The Book of Judith is still included in Catholic bibles today, but it has been rejected by Protestants. As far as I know it is no longer in the Hebrew canon although the name Judith still retains its popularity.

According to Anderson Giorgione’s painting was originally a door panel since there is evidence of a painted over keyhole. ###


*Anderson, Jaynie: Giorgione, 1997, p. 292.

**Pignatti, Terisio and Pedrocco, Filippo: Giorgione, Rizzoli, 1999, p. 52.

***Eller, Wolfgang: Giorgione Catalog Raisonne, Petersberg, 2007, p. 47.

#Pignatti, op. cit., p. 42.

##Eller, op.cit., p. 48.


Recent Posts

Titian: Madonna of the Rabbit or “Mystic Marriage of St. Catherine


Titian’s so-called “Madonna of the Rabbit,” currently hangs in the Louvre. The Museum’s website notes the popular title but more accurately labels the painting as “The Virgin and Child with St. Catherine and a Shepherd, known as the Madonna of the Rabbit.” Actually, a better title would be “The Mystic Marriage of St. Catherine,” a common devotional subject during the Renaissance.

Today, I placed in the page section of this site an interpretive essay on the painting that originally appeared on January 7, 2014 as a post on my blog, Giorgione et al…  In the essay I take issue with the Louvre and others about two important details in the painting.

In the first place, I do not believe that Titian has depicted a shepherd in this painting.  In my interpretation the man dressed in rustic attire in the mid-ground is St. Joseph, the protector of Mary and the infant Jesus. He is often included in versions of the Mystic Marriage by Venetian renaissance artists.

Secondly, although the label, “Madonna of the Rabbit” will probably lnever be changed, I disagree with the Louvre’s explanation that the white rabbit is a sign of Mary’s virginal fecundity. X-ray examination has shown that the rabbit was not originally present. Initially, Titian placed Mary’s left arm on her lap. Why, on second thought, did he add the white rabbit?  My essay argues that the white rabbit is the equivalent of the Eucharistic host.


  1. Giorgione et al… Comments Off on Giorgione et al…
  2. Michelangelo: Doni Tondo Comments Off on Michelangelo: Doni Tondo
  3. Renaissance Mysteries Solved: Update Leave a reply